Alien (Scott, 1979)


Visually, for 1979, the film is quite rich. While some of the shots of the spacecraft and alien are downright laughable by today’s standards, the one major quality that they hold is a material nature. With CGI, no matter how brilliantly an image is constructed, its artificiality shows. With Alien, its film quality plus the material/tangible use of everything gives it a greater sense of reality, primarily with one’s sense of touch. The alien and the spacecraft have a flesh which one can imaging touching: a stubbly, matte aircraft, the scales, the oozing flesh. There’s something very David Cronenberg happening here and its the body-horror images

The film’s sound-design is superb, with many of the effects and the careful adjusting of levels between right and left channels quite haunting and affective.

The lack of story background is both an advantage and disadvantage. The film stands on its own in a world untethered, but at the same time it does not rise from mere caricature to literature; the story is simple and effective, but a little lacking in depth. Helpful as a genre piece, this limits the film’s approach and forces it to remain within horror even more than in science-fiction, as there is no real science to speak of.

80/100 – Great

4 Stars


About Kamran Ahmed

I have a Masters in Cinema Studies from the University of Toronto. I work as a freelance writer and film critic in Vancouver. My writing is primarily distributed through Next Projection, an online film journal based in Toronto.
This entry was posted in Reviews (capsule) and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s